122 | nº 29, pp. 113-137 | doxa.comunicación
July-December of 2019
Agenda and media pluralism in Al Rojo Vivo and Las Mañanas de Cuatro
ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978
Agencia Catalana de Noticias
2
0
0,83
La Vanguardia
2
26
7
L`Eco de Sitges
1
0
0
Economía Digital
1
0
0
Hydra Media
1
0
0
Carne Cruda
1
6
3
Racó Catalá
1
0
4,33
Libertad Digital
1
0
0
(Lawyers, judges)
1
76
2
(Political Scientists, sociologists)
1
25
0.33
(Teachers, University professors)
0
85
22.17
(Civil associations)
0
32
13.83
(Police, GC, Mossos)
0
28
0
(Economists)
0
35
6.5
El Español
0
8
0
El Mundo
0
12
0
Mediaset
0
14
0.5
(Playwrights)
0
5
4.5
TV3
0
4
0
Total
138
388
124
Source: Prepared by the authors based on the results of this research.
It is worth noting that both in Al Rojo Vivo as well as in Las Mañanas de Cuatro the cases of spokespersons from associations and university professors, because, although a priori it may seem because of their social roles they would not receive many refutations from the moderator who invited them to the programme, however, the data reflects that they received refutations and counter-arguments above that of the average. This is even more striking when one observes that people linked to the so-called State sewers, such as Eduardo Inda, Esteban Urreiztieta and Dani Montero4, did not receive any counter-arguments.
4 “Inda, Urreiztieta, Alfonso Rojo y Daniel Montero a sueldo de la presunta organización criminal de Villarejo”. Patricia López, Público.es, 27-03-2019. https://www.publico.es/politica/audio-prueba-villarejo-e-inda-le-dieron-pequeno-nicolas-grabacion-cni.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=web
