Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10637/15519

Anaesthetic mortality in dogs: a worldwide analysis and risk assessment


Thumbnail

See/Open:
 Anaesthetic_Redondo_VR_2023.pdf
1,2 MB
Adobe PDF
Title: Anaesthetic mortality in dogs: a worldwide analysis and risk assessment
Authors : Redondo García, José Ignacio.
Otero, Pablo E.
Martínez Taboada, Fernando.
Doménech Ballester, Luis
Hernández Magaña, Eva Zoe
Viscasillas Monteagudo, Jaime
Keywords: MortalidadMortalityAnestesia veterinariaVeterinary anesthesiaAnalgesia veterinariaAnalgesia (Veterinary)PerrosDogs
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Citation: Redondo, J.I., Otero, P.E., Martínez-Taboada, F., Doménech, L., Hernández-Magaña, E.Z. & Viscasillas, J. (2023). Anaesthetic mortality in dogs: a worldwide analysis and risk assessment. Veterinary Record, art. e3604. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.3604
Abstract: Background:Ensuring patient safety during small animal anaesthesia is cru-cial. This study aimed to assess anaesthetic-related deaths in dogs globally,identify risks and protective factors and inform clinical practice.Methods:This prospective cohort multicentric study involved 55,022 dogsfrom 405 veterinary centres across various countries. Data on anaesthesia-related deaths from premedication to 48 hours post-extubation werecollected. Logistic regression was used to analyse patient demographics,American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, procedure typeand anaesthetic drugs used.Results:Anaesthetic-related mortality was 0.69%. Most deaths occurred post-operatively (81%). Age, obesity and a higher ASA classification score wereassociated with increased mortality. Urgent procedures, non-urgent butunscheduled anaesthesias and short procedures also had higher mortality.Some sedatives, systemic analgesics, hypnotics and the use of locoregionalanaesthesia were linked to a decrease in mortality.Limitations:The limitations of the study include the non-randomised sam-ple, potential selection bias, lack of response rate quantification, variable dataquality control, subjectivity in classifying causes of death and limited analysisof variables.Conclusion:Careful patient evaluation, drug selection and monitoring canbe associated with reduced mortality. These findings can be used to developguidelines and strategies to improve patient safety and outcomes. Furtherresearch is needed to refine protocols, enhance data quality systems andexplore additional risk mitigation measures.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10637/15519
Rights : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Open Access
ISSN: 0042-4900
2042-7670 (Electrónico)
Supported by: Acuerdo Transformativo - 2023
Issue Date: 2023
Center : Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU
Appears in Collections:Dpto. Medicina y Cirugía Animal





Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.