Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma.

dc.centroUniversidad San Pablo-CEU
dc.contributor.authorAgache, Ioana
dc.contributor.authorChivato Pérez, Tomás
dc.contributor.authorBeltran, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorAkdis, Cezmi A.
dc.contributor.authorAkdis, Mubeccel
dc.contributor.authorCanelo Aybar, C.
dc.contributor.authorCanonica, Giorgio Walter
dc.contributor.authorCasale, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorCorren, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorGiacco, Stefano del
dc.contributor.authorEiwegger, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFirinu, Davide
dc.contributor.authorGern, James E.
dc.contributor.authorHamelmann, Eckard
dc.contributor.authorHanania, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorMäkelä, Mika
dc.contributor.authorHernández Martín, Irene
dc.contributor.authorO'Mahony, Liam
dc.contributor.authorPapi, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hae-Sim
dc.contributor.authorPérez de Llano, Luis
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorQuirce, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorSastre, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorShamji, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yang
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Corinna
dc.contributor.authorSchwarze, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Coello, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorPalomares, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorJutel, Marek
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad San Pablo-CEU. Facultad de Medicina.
dc.coverageNair, P.
dc.coveragePapadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
dc.coveragePosso, Margarita
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T11:30:14Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T11:30:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractFive biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV1, without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drugrelated adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV1. More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.en_EN
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationEfficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma. Allergy. 2020;75:1023– 1042. https ://doi.org/10.1111/all.14221en_EN
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/all.14221
dc.identifier.issn1398-9995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/15129
dc.language.isoenen_EN
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofAllergy
dc.rightsopen access
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectBiologicalsen_EN
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_EN
dc.subjectEfficacyen_EN
dc.subjectSevere-eosinophilic-asthmaen_EN
dc.subjectSafetyen_EN
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma.en_EN
dc.typeArtículo
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc673d3f9-5beb-4f30-acfe-5871b2282eec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc673d3f9-5beb-4f30-acfe-5871b2282eec

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Efficacy_Agache_et_al_Allergy_2020.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections