Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10637/14780

Osteopathic manipulative treatment including specific diaphragm techniques improves pain and disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial


See/Open:
 Osteopathic_Marti_APMR_2018.pdf
  Restricted Access
1,32 MB
Adobe PDF
 Request a copy
See/Open:
 Osteopathic_Marti_APMR_2018.JPG
135,8 kB
JPEG
Title: Osteopathic manipulative treatment including specific diaphragm techniques improves pain and disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial
Authors : Martí Salvador, Mireia
Hidalgo Moreno, Laura
Doménech Fernández, Julio
Lisón Párraga, Juan Francisco
Arguisuelas Martínez, María Dolores
Keywords: Rehabilitación médicaMedical rehabilitationTratamiento médicoMedical treatment
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Martí-Salvador, M., Hidalgo-Moreno, L., Doménech-Fernández, J., Lisón, J. F. & Arguisuelas, M. D. (2018). Osteopathic manipulative treatment including specific diaphragm techniques improves pain and disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 99, i. 9 (sep.), pp. 1720–1729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.022
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of an osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), which includes a diaphragm intervention compared to the same OMT with a sham diaphragm intervention in chronic nonspecific low back pain (NS-CLBP). Design: Parallel group randomized controlled trial. Setting: Private and institutional health centers. Participants: Participants (N=66) (18-60y) with a diagnosis of NS-CLBP lasting at least 3 months. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either an OMT protocol including specific diaphragm techniques (n=33) or the same OMT protocol with a sham diaphragm intervention (n=33), conducted in 5 sessions provided during 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were pain (evaluated with the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ] and the visual analog scale [VAS]) and disability (assessed with the Roland–Morris Questionnaire [RMQ] and the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]). Secondary outcomes were fear-avoidance beliefs, level of anxiety and depression, and pain catastrophization. All outcome measures were evaluated at baseline, at week 4, and at week 12. Results: A statistically significant reduction was observed in the experimental group compared to the sham group in all variables assessed at week 4 and at week 12 (SF-MPQ [mean difference −6.2; 95% confidence interval, −8.6 to −3.8]; VAS [mean difference −2.7; 95% confidence interval, −3.6 to −1.8]; RMQ [mean difference −3.8; 95% confidence interval, −5.4 to −2.2]; ODI [mean difference −10.6; 95% confidence interval, −14.9 to 6.3]). Moreover, improvements in pain and disability were clinically relevant. Conclusions: An OMT protocol that includes diaphragm techniques produces significant and clinically relevant improvements in pain and disability in patients with NS-CLBP compared to the same OMT protocol using sham diaphragm techniques.
Description: Este recurso no está disponible en acceso abierto por política de la editorial.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10637/14780
Rights : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
ISSN: 0003-9993
Issue Date: 1-Sep-2018
Center : Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU
Appears in Collections:Dpto. Enfermería y Fisioterapia





Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.