Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10637/16050
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.otherProducción Científica UCH 2024-
dc.contributor.otherUCH. Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal-
dc.contributor.otherUCH. Departamento de Matemáticas, Física y Ciencias Tecnológicas-
dc.creatorRedondo García, José Ignacio-
dc.creatorMartínez Taboada, Fernando-
dc.creatorViscasillas Monteagudo, Jaime-
dc.creatorDoménech Ballester, Luis-
dc.creatorMarti Scharfhausen, Reyes-
dc.creatorHernández Magaña, Eva Zoe-
dc.creatorOtero, Pablo E.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T10:19:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-09T10:19:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-06-
dc.identifier.citationRedondo, J.I., Martínez-Taboada, F., Viscasillas, J., Doménech, L., Marti-Scharfhausen, R., Hernández-Magaña, E.Z. & Otero, P.E. (2024). Anaesthetic mortality in cats: a worldwide analysis and risk assessment. The Veterinary Record, vol. 195, i. 1, art. e4147 (06 jul.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.4147es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0042-4900-
dc.identifier.issn2042-7670 (Electrónico)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/16050-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patient safety is essential in small animal anaesthesia. Thisstudy aimed to assess anaesthesia-related deaths in cats worldwide, identifyrisk and protective factors and provide insights for clinical practice.Methods: A prospective multicentre cohort study of 14,962 cats from198 veterinary centres across different countries was conducted. Data onanaesthesia-related deaths, from premedication up to 48 hours postex-tubation, were collected. Logistic regression was used to analyse patientdemographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification,procedure type and anaesthetic drugs.Results: The anaesthesia-related mortality was 0.63%, with 74.5% of deathsoccurring postoperatively. Cats with cachexia, a higher ASA status or whounderwent abdominal, orthopaedic/neurosurgical or thoracic proceduresexhibited elevated mortality. Mechanical ventilation use was associated withincreased mortality. Mortality odds were reduced by the use of alpha2 -agonistsedatives, pure opioids in premedication and locoregional techniques.Limitations: Limitations include non-randomised sampling, potentialbiases, unquantified response rates, subjective death cause classification andlimited variable analysis.Conclusions: Anaesthetic mortality in cats is significant, predominantlypostoperative. Risk factors include cachexia, higher ASA status, specificprocedures and mechanical ventilation. Protective factors include alpha2 -agonist sedatives, pure opioids and locoregional techniques. These findingscan help improve anaesthesia safety and outcomes. However, further researchis required to improve protocols, enhance data quality and minimise risks.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAcuerdo Transformativo – 2024-
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofThe Veterinary record, vol. 195, i. 1-
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es-
dc.rightsOpen Access-
dc.subjectAnestesia veterinariaes_ES
dc.subjectVeterinary anesthesiaes_ES
dc.subjectGatoses_ES
dc.subjectCatses_ES
dc.subjectMortalidades_ES
dc.subjectMortalityes_ES
dc.titleAnaesthetic mortality in cats: a worldwide analysis and risk assessmentes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.4147-
dc.centroUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU-
Appears in Collections:Dpto. Medicina y Cirugía Animal




Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.