Comparison of obturation removal efficiency from straight root canals with ProTaper Gold or Reciproc Bluey : a micro-computed tomography analysis

dc.centroUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU
dc.contributor.authorFaus Matoses, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorSauro, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorPasarín Linares, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorFaus Matoses, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorFoschi, Federico
dc.contributor.authorFaus Llácer, Vicente
dc.contributor.otherUCH. Departamento de Odontología
dc.contributor.otherProducción Científica UCH 2020
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T04:00:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T04:00:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-18
dc.descriptionEste artículo se encuentra disponible en la siguiente URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/4/1164
dc.descriptionEste artículo pertenece a la sección "Stomatology".
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objective was to evaluate the e ciency of ProTaper Gold (PTG) and Reciproc Blue (RB) NiTi files in obturation material removal from straight root canals assessed by micro-computed tomography. Methods: Fifty-two anterior human teeth were shaped with a PTG rotary system until F2 (25/.08). Specimens were obturated with a continuous wave of condensation technique. For retreatment, specimens were randomly distributed in two experimental groups: PTG group (F4 file) and RB (R40 file). Micro-CT scans were performed before and after retreatment procedures. The percentage of the remaining obturation material compared to the original volume was calculated, as well as the retreatment time. The presence of separated files was recorded. A descriptive analysis was carried out, and nonparametric tests were employed. Results: The mean percentages of remaining obturation material in the PTG group and the RB group were 4.14 4.30% and 4.18 4.29%, respectively. The mean retreatment times for the PTG and RB groups were 144 51 and 163 88 s, respectively. There were no statistically significant di erences, neither in removal e ciency (p > 0.05) nor in retreatment time (p > 0.05), between the two groups. The coronal and middle thirds presented significantly more remaining obturation material than the apical third (p < 0.05). No file separation occurred. Conclusions: ProTaper Gold and Reciproc Blue present with comparable e ciency in removing the obturation material, with a similar mean retreatment time.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationFaus-Matoses, V., Pasarín-Linares, C., Faus-Matoses, I., Foschi, F., Sauro, S. & Faus-Llácer, V.J. (2020). Comparison of obturation removal efficiency from straight root canals with ProTaper Gold or Reciproc Blue: a micro-computed tomography study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, i. 4 (18 apr.), art. 1164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041164
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041164
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383 (Electrónico).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/12565
dc.language.isoes
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, n. 4.
dc.rightsopen access
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectNickel in Dentistry.
dc.subjectNíquel - Aplicaciones en Odontología.
dc.subjectEndodoncia.
dc.subjectTeeth - Roots - Planing.
dc.subjectDientes - Cavidades - Preparación.
dc.subjectOdontología restauradora.
dc.subjectDentistry, Operative.
dc.subjectTitanio - Aplicaciones en Odontología.
dc.subjectTitanium in Dentistry.
dc.subjectDientes - Tomografía.
dc.subjectTeeth - Tomography.
dc.subjectMateriales dentales.
dc.subjectDental materials.
dc.subjectAleaciones en odontología.
dc.subjectDental metallurgy.
dc.subjectEndodontics.
dc.titleComparison of obturation removal efficiency from straight root canals with ProTaper Gold or Reciproc Bluey : a micro-computed tomography analysis
dc.typeArtículo
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication04e6d781-e677-456e-b56c-ea3fca357bf2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery04e6d781-e677-456e-b56c-ea3fca357bf2

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison_Faus_JOCM_2020.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format