Comparative analysis of the smear layer removal capability between EndoVac and Endoactivator endodontic irrigation systems at the root canal system and isthmus: a micro-computed tomography analysis

dc.centroUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU
dc.contributor.authorFaus Llácer, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorSauro, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorLuna Roa, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorFaus Matoses, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Sánchez, Celia
dc.contributor.authorZubizarreta Macho, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorFaus Matoses, Vicente
dc.contributor.otherProducción Científica UCH 2020
dc.contributor.otherUCH. Departamento de Odontología
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T04:00:19Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T04:00:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-10
dc.descriptionEste artículo se encuentra disponible en la siguiente URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/20/7033
dc.descriptionEste artículo pertenece al número especial "Applied simulation and experiment research in dentistry".
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this comparative study is to analyze the e cacy of EndoVac and Endoactivator endodontic irrigation systems for removing the endodontic smear layer present in the coronal, middle, and apical root third of the root canal system (RCS) and the isthmus from mesial roots from the first lower molar teeth using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. The study was performed on 40 mesial roots that were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group A, EndoVac endodontic irrigation system (EV) (n = 10); Group B, Endoactivator endodontic irrigation system (EA) (n = 10); Group C, Root canal systems performed with F2 ProTaper Gold endodontic rotary system but not irrigated (Positive control) (n = 10); Group D, Root canal systems not performed or irrigated (Negative control) (n = 10). The samples were exposed to micro-CT analysis and the mesial roots were segmented using an advanced image segmentation technique based on partial di erential equations (ROI: 10 10 10 mm) and the root canal systems and isthmus were reconstructed at a resolution of 25 microns per voxel. The EA study group showed statistically significant di erent residual endodontic smear layer volume (0.48 0.24 mm3) compared to the EV study group (0.18 0.15 mm3) (p = 0.016). The EV endodontic irrigation system performed a higher smear layer removal at coronal and middle root thirds, compared to the EA endodontic irrigation system; however, the EA endodontic irrigation system performed a higher smear layer removal at the apical root third, compared to the EV endodontic irrigation system.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationFaus-Llácer, V., Luna-Roa, M., Faus-Matoses, I., Ruiz-Sánchez, C., Zubizarreta-Macho, Á., Sauro, S. et al. (2020). Comparative analysis of the smear layer removal capability between EndoVac and Endoactivator endodontic irrigation systems at the root canal system and isthmus: a micro-computed tomography analysis. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, i. 20 (10 oct.), art. 7033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207033
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app10207033
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417 (Electrónico).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/12557
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences, vol. 10, n. 20.
dc.rightsopen access
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectTeeth - Tomography.
dc.subjectEndodoncia.
dc.subjectEndodontics.
dc.subjectDental therapeutics - Equipment and supplies.
dc.subjectTeeth - Roots - Planing.
dc.subjectDientes - Tomografía.
dc.subjectTerapéutica dental - Aparatos y material.
dc.subjectDientes - Cavidades - Preparación.
dc.titleComparative analysis of the smear layer removal capability between EndoVac and Endoactivator endodontic irrigation systems at the root canal system and isthmus: a micro-computed tomography analysis
dc.typeArtículo
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication04e6d781-e677-456e-b56c-ea3fca357bf2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery04e6d781-e677-456e-b56c-ea3fca357bf2

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative_Faus_AS_2020.pdf
Size:
1.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format