Comparative study of alternative methods for food safety control in poultry slaughterhouses

dc.centroUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU
dc.contributor.authorReiter, Mercedes Gabriela Ratto
dc.contributor.authorJordano, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Luis Manuel
dc.contributor.authorLópez Mendoza, María Carmen
dc.contributor.otherUCH. Departamento de Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos
dc.contributor.otherProducción Científica UCH 2010
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T07:36:59Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T07:36:59Z
dc.date.issued2010-09
dc.descriptionEste recurso no está disponible en acceso abierto por política de la editorial.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe sensitivity of different methods for the isolation and identification of Campylobacter, Listeria and Salmonella was compared, and their application in food safety control in a poultry slaughterhouse was evaluated. The VIDAS, SimPlate, Reveal and VIP systems were used, together with traditional microbiological methods. The study was carried out in a slaughterhouse and in the poultry carving room. One hundred and twenty samples (40 per microorganism) obtained from carcasses, viscera, different chicken parts, water and the environment were evaluated. For Campylobacter, the VIDAS system performed better than plate confirmation. The traditional method yielded results similar to those obtained with the SimPlate method. For Listeria, the plate count method proved less sensitive than the VIDAS, VIP and Reveal systems, which yielded similar results. For Salmonella, the VIDAS system displayed a detection rate comparable to that of traditional methods, while the Reveal system detected twice as many positive samples (16 in total). The Reveal method performed significantly better than either the plate count method or the VIDAS system. The alternative methods used here could be successfully applied in food safety control in poultry slaughterhouses, providing similar or better results and taking less time to perform. The VIDAS system, in general, and the Reveal system in the case of Listeria and Salmonella, appear to be effective alternatives to traditional methods.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationReiter, M.G.R., López Mendoza, M.C., Jordano, R., & Medina, L.M. (2010). Comparative study of alternative methods for food safety control in poultry slaughterhouses. Food Analytical Methods, 3, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-010-9129-5es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-010-9129-5
dc.identifier.issn1936-9751
dc.identifier.issn1936-976X (Electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/16290
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.ispartofFood Analytical Methods, 3
dc.rightsopen access
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectAve de corrales_ES
dc.subjectPoultryes_ES
dc.subjectIndustria cárnicaes_ES
dc.subjectMeat processing industryes_ES
dc.subjectSeguridad de los alimentoses_ES
dc.subjectFood safetyes_ES
dc.subjectControl de alimentoses_ES
dc.subjectFood controles_ES
dc.subjectAnálisis comparativoes_ES
dc.subjectComparative analysises_ES
dc.titleComparative study of alternative methods for food safety control in poultry slaughterhouseses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2520e1bb-b810-43e8-bf99-92a793d8c9fc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2520e1bb-b810-43e8-bf99-92a793d8c9fc

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative_Reiter_FAM_2010.pdf
Size:
167.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format