In vitro evaluation of different irrigation protocols on intracanal smear layer removal in teeth with or without pre-endodontic proximal wall restoration

dc.centroUniversidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU
dc.contributor.authorKharouf, Naji
dc.contributor.authorSauro, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorPedullà, Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorLa Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria
dc.contributor.authorBukiet, Frédéric
dc.contributor.authorHaikel, Youssef
dc.contributor.authorMancino, Davide
dc.contributor.otherUCH. Departamento de Odontología
dc.contributor.otherProducción Científica UCH 2020
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T04:00:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T04:00:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-16
dc.descriptionEste artículo se encuentra disponible en la siguiente URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3325
dc.descriptionEste artículo pertenece al número especial "Root Canal Treatment (RCT): latest advances and prospects".
dc.description.abstractTo investigate the influence of pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration on smear layer removal during di erent root canal irrigation strategies, single-root premolars were prepared with a mesio-occlusal cavity. Half were left untreated (G1), while the mesial walls of the remaining half were reconstructed using a resin composite (G2). The specimens were divided into control (ctrl) groups, which used the conventional needle irrigation method, and four experimental subgroups according to irrigation strategy: Sonic activation using the Endoactivator, sonic activation using the EQ-S, mechanical activation using the XP-Endo finisher, and ultrasonic activation using the EndoUltra. Smear layer removal was assessed through SEM and the results were statistically analyzed. At the coronal and middle thirds, no significant di erence (p > 0.05) was detected for G1 and G2, except for the control subgroups (G1ctrl vs G2 ctrl) at the middle third. At the apical third, the smear layer removal was significantly greater for G2 than G1. In G1, both at the middle and apical level, EQ-S and EndoUltra showed greater smear layer removal (p < 0.05) compared to the others G1 subgroups. In G2, at the apical level, the EQ-S and EndoUltra were the most e ective in smear layer removal. Pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration may improve the smear layer removal during root canal irrigation.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationKharouf, N., Pedullà, E., La Rosa, G.R.M., Bukiet, F., Sauro, S., Haikel, Y. et al. (2020). In vitro evaluation of different irrigation protocols on intracanal smear layer removal in teeth with or without pre-endodontic proximal wall restoration. Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, i. 10 (16 oct.), art. 3325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103325
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103325
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383 (Electrónico).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/12563
dc.language.isoes
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, n. 10.
dc.rightsopen access
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectDentin.
dc.subjectTeeth - Roots - Planing.
dc.subjectDentina.
dc.subjectOdontología restauradora.
dc.subjectDentistry, Operative.
dc.subjectDientes - Cavidades - Preparación.
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of different irrigation protocols on intracanal smear layer removal in teeth with or without pre-endodontic proximal wall restoration
dc.typeArtículo
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication04e6d781-e677-456e-b56c-ea3fca357bf2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery04e6d781-e677-456e-b56c-ea3fca357bf2

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Vitro_Kharouf_JOCM_2020.pdf
Size:
4.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format