Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10637/15730
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Abat Oliba CEU. Departament de Psicologia-
dc.contributor.otherProducció Científica UAO 2023-
dc.creatorEnríquez, Teresa-
dc.creatorAlonso Stuyck, Paloma-
dc.creatorMartínez-Villaseñor, María de Lourdes-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T12:50:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-12T12:50:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationEnríquez, T.; Alonso-Stuyck, P.; Martínez-Villaseñor, L. The Language of Nature and Artificial Intelligence in Patient Care. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6499. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156499es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10637/15730-
dc.descriptionEste artículo está en acceso abierto, siguiendo la política de acceso de la editorial-
dc.description.abstractGiven the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and the conditions of vulnerability of large sectors of the population, the question emerges: what are the ethical limits of technologies in patient care? This paper examines this question in the light of the “language of nature” and of Aristotelian causal analysis, in particular the concept of means and ends. Thus, it is possible to point out the root of the distinction between the identity of the person and the entity of any technology. Nature indicates that the person is always an end in itself. Technology, on the contrary, should only be a means to serve the person. The diversity of their respective natures also explains why their respective agencies enjoy diverse scopes. Technological operations (artificial agency, artificial intelligence) find their meaning in the results obtained through them (poiesis). Moreover, the person is capable of actions whose purpose is precisely the action itself (praxis), in which personal agency and, ultimately, the person themselves, is irreplaceable. Forgetting the distinction between what, by nature, is an end and what can only be a means is equivalent to losing sight of the instrumental nature of AI and, therefore, its specific meaning: the greatest good of the patient. It is concluded that the language of nature serves as a filter that supports the effective subordination of the use of AI to its specific purpose, the human good. The greatest contribution of this work is to draw attention to the nature of the person and technology, and about their respective agencies. In other words: listening to the language of nature, and attending to the diverse nature of the person and technology, personal agency, and artificial agency.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherFlorian Steger and Marcin Orzechowskies_ES
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health-
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es-
dc.rightsOpen Access-
dc.subjectLanguage of naturees_ES
dc.subjectArtificial intelligencees_ES
dc.subjectEthicses_ES
dc.subjectPatient carees_ES
dc.titleThe Language of Natureand Artificial Intelligence in Patient Carees_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156499-
dc.centroUniversitat Abat Oliba CEU-
Aparece en las colecciones: Documents de recerca




Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.